Meryl Streep Disapproves of Marvel-Style Characterization in Films
Roger EbertPulitzer Prize-winning film critic whose reviews and essays defined cinema criticism for decades.
Meryl Streep, a three-time Oscar recipient, conveyed her disapproval of the contemporary cinematic trend that simplifies characters into clear-cut heroes or villains, referring to it as “boring.” She shared these thoughts during an appearance on the "Hits Breakfast Radio Show" with "The Devil Wears Prada 2" co-stars Emily Blunt and Anne Hathaway. Streep advocated for more intricate and true-to-life portrayals, where the lines between good and bad are blurred, contending that this approach is more reflective of human nature and makes narratives more engaging.
During her May 1 appearance on the "Hits Breakfast Radio Show," Meryl Streep discussed her views on contemporary filmmaking practices, particularly the trend of defining characters in terms of clear-cut good and evil. This conversation, held alongside her "The Devil Wears Prada 2" co-stars Emily Blunt and Anne Hathaway, delved into the popular fan theory regarding the villainy of Adrian Grenier's character, Nate, in the original "The Devil Wears Prada" film. Streep expressed her belief that life and, by extension, cinematic characters are far more intricate than simple archetypes would suggest.
Streep humorously remarked on Adrian Grenier's character, Nate, acknowledging his charm and acting skills while dismissing the notion of him as a straightforward villain. The conversation then shifted to Miranda Priestly, Streep's character in "The Devil Wears Prada 2," and how the sequel reveals a more multifaceted side to her. Streep noted that this approach contrasts with what she termed the "Marvel-ization" of movies, where roles are often starkly divided into heroes and villains, a simplification she finds uninteresting.
She elaborated on her preference for narratives that embrace the complexities of human nature, where even protagonists can have flaws and antagonists possess redeeming qualities or compelling backstories. Streep believes that this nuanced portrayal makes stories more authentic and captivating, highlighting that true-to-life individuals are rarely purely good or evil. She emphasized that a "messier" and more realistic depiction of characters ultimately enriches the cinematic experience.
Adrian Grenier, who does not appear in the sequel, had previously reflected on the audience's perception of Nate in a 2021 interview with Entertainment Weekly. He acknowledged the online discourse and memes that painted Nate as a selfish and self-involved partner to Andy (Anne Hathaway), recognizing the validity of this perspective in retrospect. Grenier admitted that his own immaturity at the time of the first film's release might have mirrored Nate's lack of support for Andy's career. He later playfully addressed his absence from the sequel in a Starbucks commercial, embracing the idea of leaving Nate's character in the past.
Streep's commentary champions a deeper exploration of character, moving beyond facile classifications to reveal the intricate tapestry of human experience, where motivations are complex and moral lines are often indistinct. Her stance advocates for films that mirror the nuanced realities of life, providing audiences with more thoughtful and engaging portrayals that challenge conventional hero-villain narratives and foster a richer understanding of fictional worlds.

